SWT versus Swing

21 May 2007

Many Java developers fear to adopt a solution based on SWT, because of the possibility of losing the portability of Java applications and because of the necessity of generating different installations for each client platform.

Swing is only available in platforms that support J2SE, Windows systems (except CE), Unix (including Linux) and Mac OS. SWT is available in the same platforms, which is facilitated by its nature of free software. But SWT goes further, supporting Windows CE / Pocket PC with J2ME systems. In fact, it’s even easier to get an updated version of SWT than an updated Swing version, because in many platforms J2SE was not updated since version 1.3.0.

Another advantage of SWT is that Swing manages allocation and releasing of native resources in a transparent but inefficient way. SWT waits the application to do this management. The greater control and efficiency of manual releasing makes SWT lighter than Swing, especially in applications that run for a long period of time.

Related Posts:

Posted in Computers and Internet

Tags: none

del.icio.us:SWT versus Swing  digg:SWT versus Swing  spurl:SWT versus Swing  wists:SWT versus Swing  simpy:SWT versus Swing  newsvine:SWT versus Swing  blinklist:SWT versus Swing  furl:SWT versus Swing  reddit:SWT versus Swing  fark:SWT versus Swing  blogmarks:SWT versus Swing  Y!:SWT versus Swing  smarking:SWT versus Swing  magnolia:SWT versus Swing  segnalo:SWT versus Swing  gifttagging:SWT versus Swing

Top Of Page | Trackback

If you found this page useful, consider linking to it. Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site.

It will look like this: SWT versus Swing

Leave a Reply